Linkcom Manufacturing Co., Ltd

With the rapid evolution of high-speed communication technologies, magnetic components used in LAN, Balun, and PoE applications face increasingly stringent performance requirements. At GHz-level frequencies, parameters such as insertion loss, return loss, and common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) have a decisive influence on system stability and signal integrity.

However, the accuracy of these parameters often depends on the selection and execution of calibration methods. This article examines the principles, differences, and application scenarios of various VNA calibration techniques, analyzes their impact on LAN/Balun test results using equivalent circuit models, and concludes with LinkCom’s practical test-integration strategies.

In high-frequency magnetic component design and testing, equivalent circuits are not merely theoretical tools—they form the engineering language for understanding component behavior.

Magnetic components are not single-function structures. They consist of multiple electrical characteristics, including coupling inductance, leakage inductance, parasitic capacitance, and common-mode impedance. These parameters interact in complex ways at high frequencies, affecting signal transmission, impedance matching, and energy-conversion efficiency.

Through equivalent circuit modeling, engineers can:

• Translate physical structures into measurable electrical parameters—for example, how winding structures affect leakage inductance or how core materials contribute to losses.
• Predict parameter shifts introduced by different calibration methods—for instance, SOLT’s sensitivity to parasitic capacitance or TRL’s ability to compensate phase deviations.
• Build a logical bridge between design and testing—allowing engineers not only to “see the data” but also to “understand the reasons behind it.”

More importantly, equivalent circuits enable reverse analysis. When test results appear abnormal, engineers can trace back through the model to determine whether the issue originates from design, manufacturing variation, or the test method itself.

For LAN transformers and Baluns, this modeling mindset is essential because their performance affects not only signal quality but also overall system stability and noise immunity. We now turn to an analysis of major calibration principles:

---

📐 Overview of Calibration Principles

Calibration Method	Principle Summary	Advantages	Limitations	Application Scenarios
SOLT (Short-Open-Load-Thru)	Builds an error model using known impedance standards	Fast calibration, widely supported	Highly sensitive to fixture structure; requires precise standards	General PCB measurement, low-frequency magnetic components
TRL (Thru-Reflect-Line)	Uses transmission-line characteristics to derive phase and reflection errors	Ideal for high-frequency; compensates fixture errors	Requires custom calibration structures; preparation cost is high	High-frequency Balun; differential-line testing
LRM (Line-Reflect-Match)	Establishes error models using matched loads and reflections	Suitable for non-symmetric structures	Accuracy depends on match-load quality	Non-standard connectors; special-package components
De-embedding	Removes fixture effects using S-parameter modeling	Recovers true component performance	Highly dependent on model accuracy; error accumulation possible	Packaged components; modular testing

---

🔍 Impact of Calibration from an Equivalent-Circuit Perspective

For LAN transformers and Baluns, the typical equivalent circuit includes:

• Mutual inductance
• Parasitic capacitance
• Leakage inductance
• Common-mode impedance

Different calibration techniques influence the measurement accuracy of these parameters:

Test Parameter	Sensitive Component	Calibration Effect	Notes
Insertion Loss	Coupling & leakage inductance	SOLT tends to underestimate loss; TRL more accurate	Effect becomes more significant at high frequencies
Return Loss	Parasitic capacitance & impedance matching	SOLT is highly sensitive to fixture variations; may misjudge matching quality	Often requires de-embedding
CMRR	Common-mode impedance, winding symmetry	TRL provides accurate differential-reflection measurement	Critical for Balun design
Phase Deviation	Line topology, parasitic elements	TRL/LRM compensate phase-related errors	Affects high-speed signal integrity

---

🧠 LinkCom’s Test-Integration Strategy

Based on product frequency range and packaging type, LinkCom adopts a layered testing approach:

• LAN transformers: SOLT calibration with precision PCB fixtures to ensure test consistency.
• Baluns: TRL calibration and differential-test processes to enhance CMRR and phase accuracy.
• Modular packaged components: De-embedding to remove fixture influence and recover intrinsic performance.
• Specialized applications (PoE, industrial-grade routers): LRM calibration with custom-matched loads for improved accuracy in non-standard structures.

We believe testing is not the final step of verification, but an extension of design logic. Understanding why a test is performed a certain way is the foundation of designing magnetic components that are truly “worth testing.”

---

📣 Conclusion: Making Testing the Starting Point of Design

High-frequency magnetic component testing is more than instrument operation—it is a continuation of design methodology. LinkCom remains committed to advancing test transparency and standardization, helping customers build stable and efficient magnetic architectures across LAN, Balun, and PoE applications.

👉 Contact us to explore deeper insights into magnetic-component design and testing.
www.linkcom.com.tw